Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:39:00 -0800
From: ******************** ("************")
Subject: Re: [WEvans6368@aol.com: Re: **************]
To: WEvans6368@aol.com
Cc: snail@aztec.asu.edu


Ooo, you're beginning to draw blood.

Lets see: hypo-cracy, emperor's new clothes, "didn't happen on my watch",
Duh!

Don't ya love it when righteousness is on your side and their "feet held to
the fire" produces some reactions, maybe the wrong ones.

Now, if the establishment blames you for uncovering Paul's thefts, you move
to impeach them all. Get a copy of the bylaws.

I thought Humanists were supposed to be "good people" guided by
non-supernaturally dictated ethics. We know what's right and we do it.
Perhaps they don't?



----- Original Message -----
From: <WEvans6368@aol.com>
To: <********************>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WEvans6368@aol.com: Re: *****stapleton]


> ************The Bill and daughter were in denial. They were upset to

> recognize that the putz was a possible or regular thief  His daughter who

> wanted to hang up everybody in John Pizer's poll of the audience tried to

say
> he dropped a little contribution in the basket. Boorisahly, I asked her

wher
> it was. She said that sahe disliked people who ignored the honor system.

Any
> discussion of theft was embarrassingly denied. Beedie22@aol.com

>